Getting Rid of Afghanistan
[Altogether]

Should/might/could/may/would

imply/evidence/intricate/denote/sense
and does (in fact) mean that?

 

[Those involved] first recognize a need
 To eradicate Afghanistan as a cohesive and contiguous whole,
AND
 To create several city/state entities melded in the region anew

 [a singularity of self-perpetuating defensive posture].

 

Brought together out of the necessity of commonality, the new union would need to be bicameral, with Upper and Lower House provisions. Thus, for review of commerce regulation, and both Executive and Judicial review of enactments, initiations of administration are processed. But, individual representation within the republic is gained by two means: appointment and election.

 

 Appointments are demanded of the state;
To satisfy the "necessary utility" of environmental consideration;
To ensconce and satisfy patronage;
AND
To generate essential commerce traffic.

 

 Elections are demanded by the public:
To create the illusion of self-government,
To insure some manner of moral regeneration through laws,
AND
To define the regulation of commerce and justice, the Elected Officials review and endorse or reject Appointments. In balance to this power, Appointees regulate the processing of initiatives, and the logistical fulfillment of implicit orders. Effectively, one hand washes the other.

And what is so bad about that?