Act Two
(Redacted)
"Ultimate good, immediate evil..."
Attorney General John Ashcroft today refused to release listings of the
names of those persons detained since the Attack of September 11th. In a
statement hastily published online, Ashcroft demonstrated an ability
to side-step direct questions; a talent unseen and unused since the last time
Republicans tried to get over on the American people in the endless Watergate
fiasco. His semi-secretive statement was given in front of an audience of
invited Members of the American Media (unseen). Confused over the numbers
involved, as though unable to read or use simple notes, Ashcroft again presented
an image of a stuffed shirt. Reading the statement in its entirety, there
remains not doubt about the dangers given these mental midgets through the
powers they already have at hand.
On the PBS
NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,
Anthony Lewis of the New York Times expressed the danger clearer than any other
seen so far on broadcast media. The site stream of the interview (in RealAudio,
of all mediums) was inoperable when we searched for the name of the ultra-Right
counterpoint guest in the interview. With luck, we will never see this
Afro-American fool again. But that is probably asking too
much.
It is all about the Sixth Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States of
America. That document is the law upon which all other
law in this land is supposed to be based. It has been added to and
interpreted over the centuries since adopted. However, rights to property
not being seized for public use (as in auction sale) without compensation,
as expressed in the Fifth Amendment, were disappeared under guise of "ill gotten
gain" in the War on Drugs. There is no doubt that Franklin Roosevelt was given a
Mulligan when review of the original military tribunal law passed Supreme Court
muster. (The present Court has already proven their bias to ultra-right
interests.) It was a different situation back in WWII completely. This smacks of
a coup.
But, folks, its too late already. This law is more dangerous to the Republic than any other political act in our history. It will revisit its authors and adherents in coming elections; providing there is one.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home